Bibliography and methods · 4 min read
Methods, Sources, and Version History
Evidence hierarchy, reproducibility notes, implementation chronology, and citation guidance.
Inside ~Cortisol Checker~ · v1.0 · Moses Sam Paul
Quick Answer
The checker’s scoring behavior is grounded in versioned code, tests, and fixtures. External research grounds the surrounding cortisol, stress, and language discussion, but the current lexicon and weights were manually authored and have not been biologically or clinically validated.
Method
This paper reconstructs the development of ~Cortisol Checker~ from primary implementation evidence. Current scoring claims were checked against analysis-engine 0.4.1 source, executed against pinned sample text, and compared with automated calibration and contract tests. Protocol claims were checked against the hosted IoV Spec API and canonical Spec repository. Product-history claims were checked against dated Git commits, repository context, and the working Foundation/Word Wallet Web flow. Scientific context was checked against the external sources listed below.
The Foundation website is a publication and operations surface, not the protocol source of truth.
Evidence hierarchy
- Hosted IoV Spec API and canonical Spec repository for protocol grammar and trace claims.
- Released checker source, response schema, tests, and fixtures for scoring behavior.
- Word Wallet Web contracts and operations records for invocation, identity, consent, and retention behavior.
- Dated Git history and repository context for chronology.
- Peer-reviewed and authoritative external sources for cortisol physiology, stress response, and language research.
- Prior papers for intellectual framing, clearly separated from implemented behavior.
Implementation chronology
| Date | Evidence |
|---|---|
| 13 June 2026 | Initial local CLI MVP and paste-and-analyze interface |
| 14 June 2026 | Public-harm calibration, geopolitical-harm calibration, semantic frames, and safer replies |
| 16 June 2026 | Calibration suite, safety-sensitive routing, registry validation, and stable API work |
| 17 June 2026 | Schema validation and debug interface |
| 18 June 2026 | Protected service endpoint |
| 19 June 2026 | Pinned public samples |
| 20 June 2026 | Handler contract 0.4.1 |
| 21 June 2026 | Working Foundation analysis, identity connection, and participant-authored response loop documented |
Reproducibility
The two worked examples use public/fixtures/cortisol-checker-samples-0.4.1.json and the released deterministic analysis engine. The current algorithm lives in the checker repository's scoring rubric, lexicon, and context-frame modules. Safety rules and reply generation are separate services. Automated tests cover calibration ranges, sensitive-response behavior, schema shape, registry validation, and stable snapshots.
External scientific and language sources
These sources ground the surrounding scientific context. The current checker rubric is a separately versioned open research prototype: its categories, phrases, weights, caps, and labels are published for review, but have not yet been validated against a physiological dataset.
- Kaur, J., Gandhi, J., & Sharma, S. “Physiology, Cortisol.” StatPearls, updated 2025. NCBI Bookshelf. Used for cortisol physiology, daily rhythm, and HPA-axis boundaries.
- Chrousos, G. P., et al. “Stress: Endocrine Physiology and Pathophysiology.” Endotext. NCBI Bookshelf. Used for the regulated stress-system and HPA-axis flow.
- Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. “The Trier Social Stress Test.” Neuropsychobiology 28 (1993): 76–81. doi:10.1159/000119004. Laboratory protocol measuring psychobiological stress responses, including cortisol.
- Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. “Acute Stressors and Cortisol Responses.” Psychological Bulletin 130 (2004): 355–391. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.355. Meta-analysis of 208 studies; used for uncontrollability and social-evaluative-threat context.
- Saslow, L. R., et al. “Speaking under Pressure: Low Linguistic Complexity Is Linked to High Physiological and Emotional Stress Reactivity.” Psychophysiology 51 (2014): 257–266. doi:10.1111/psyp.12171. Used as evidence that language features can covary with measured stress reactivity.
- Mehl, M. R., et al. “Natural Language Indicators of Differential Gene Regulation in the Human Immune System.” PNAS 114 (2017): 12554–12559. doi:10.1073/pnas.1707373114. Used as evidence that natural-language patterns can correlate with biological processes without implying causal or individual prediction.
- Yang, Y.-C., et al. “Automatic Detection of Twitter Users Who Express Chronic Stress Experiences.” Computers, Informatics, Nursing 41 (2023): 717–724. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000985. Used for the feasibility and limits of detecting self-reported stress in social-media language.
- Rai, S., et al. “Key Language Markers of Depression on Social Media Depend on Race.” PNAS 121 (2024): e2319837121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2319837121. Used as a generalisation warning for language-based psychological models.
Claim boundaries
The score is not a biological cortisol measurement, diagnosis, medical advice, therapy, or individualized prediction. The VC = W × Vcom equation in the related Observer Attention work remains a research scaffold rather than an established economic law. Phase 1 Word Wallets create no token, payment, ownership, royalty, or financial right.
Project and protocol sources
- Hosted IoV Spec API
- Canonical protocol registry
- Observer Attention Is All You Need
- Observer Attention → Cortisol Checker → Word Wallet Web
- Word Wallet Web
- Live
~Cortisol Checker~research beta
Citation
Johnraj, Moses Sam Paul. “Inside ~Cortisol Checker~: How a felt signal became a deterministic language analysis, a registered expression, and a path toward Word Wallet Web.” Internet of Value Research Foundation, version 1.0, 2026.
The research continues
Help shape what the checker becomes next.
Receive calibration notes, methods updates, and occasional invitations to test the next research version.
By joining, you agree to receive research updates from Internet of Value Research Foundation. You can unsubscribe at any time.